Thursday, December 5, 2013

China Rejects U.S. Corn Shipment Due To GMOs

China Rejects U.S. Corn Shipment Due To GMOs; Could Be Move To Boost Domestic Prices

Reuters
China has rejected five batches of U.S. corn tainted with a genetically-modified strain not yet approved by its agriculture ministry, a move that could discourage imports amid a growing domestic supply surplus.

Traders said the spectre of further rejections could prompt a sharp decline in new Chinese orders for U.S. corn, dragging on global prices that have already dropped around 40 percent this year.

Shipments totalling 120,642 tonnes - the biggest ever grain volume to be turned away from China's ports - were found to contain the unapproved insect-resistant MIR 162 variety of corn, the General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine (AQSIQ) said on its website on Wednesday (www.aqsiq.gov.cn).

The bureau also said it had told the United States to improve its inspection procedures to ensure that it complied with Chinese quality standards.

The total volume did not include a cargo of about 60,000 tonnes that was turned away last month, it said.

"With the latest discovery, buyers and sellers are likely to be increasingly cautious about placing new orders while shipments are in danger of being rejected," ANZ Bank said in a note.

Traders had said on Tuesday that Syngenta AG's MIR 162, also known as Agrisure Viptera, had been found in some shipments to China, one of the world's largest corn importers.

The latest GMO discoveries were made at ports in Fuzhou, Shenzhen and Shandong, AQSIQ said.

Nearly 2 million tonnes of U.S. corn are currently on their way to China, and may face stringent testing for MIR 162, which Beijing has not approved for import but has been in the U.S. supply chain since 2011. The strain is already shipped to Japan, South Korea, Russia and even the European Union, which is notoriously slow in approving GMO crop varieties.

With domestic prices eroded by a corn supply glut, the authorities may be inspecting cargoes more closely to reduce import volumes, some analysts suggested.

"To some extent, there is a link to the domestic supply surplus - these are the rules of the game," said an industry analyst with a government-linked think-tank, who declined to be identified.

"We believe future incoming cargoes will face strict inspection."

AQSIQ declined to comment.

The move has already slowed the country's imports, and some cargoes may have to be re-directed to Japan or South Korea, analysts said.

The U.S. supplied nearly 94 percent of China's corn imports in the first 10 months of 2013.



MORE MEAT

In the long run, China is expected to increase corn imports as the country urbanises and demand for meat and dairy products rises, with the nation prioritising staple grains such as rice and wheat.

But China is expecting a record corn harvest this year, and demand has also been hit by a series of food safety scares early in the year, which reduced meat and poultry consumption and slashed the use of corn feed.

"Domestic firms may be scared away from the (import) market due to the (GMO) issue, which will support domestic corn prices in the south," said Feng Lichen, senior analyst with an industry portal (www.yumi.com).

Beijing has promised to stockpile the domestic harvest in the growing area of the northeast as it seeks to shore up domestic prices and boost farmer incomes.

Domestic buyers are unlikely to be especially inconvenienced by any delays brought about by the decision to reject the U.S. cargoes.

Following adjustments made to import agreements between the U.S. and China last year, U.S. exporters are now deemed liable for any losses caused by problematic or unapproved cargoes, analysts said. Previously, the buyer was held completely responsible.

As well as the 2 million tonnes of U.S. corn currently on its way, there are still another 3 million tonnes bought by China that have not yet been dispatched. Buyers might also welcome the opportunity to slow deliveries in hope that domestic prices might recover, boosting their margins if they re-sell locally.

"We saw it in cotton a few years ago - you get a sharp drop in prices and it is not beyond the realms of possibility that buyers will want to be a little more picky on specifications and use any excuse to knock back or renegotiate a cargo," said ANZ's senior agriculture analyst, Paul Deane.

"There's probably not a lot of urgency to be importing a lot of corn at the moment," he added.

Monday, December 2, 2013

Odisha opposes biotech bill

Odisha opposes biotech bill
BHUBANESWAR: The state government sought withdrawal of Biotechnology Regulatory Authority of India (BRAI) Bill, stating that it was undermining its authority.

Agriculture minister Debi Prasad Mishra on Monday in a letter to T Subbarami Reddy, chairman, Parliamentary Standing Committee on Science & Technology, Environment & Forests, requested him to recommend scrapping of the "unconstitutional" Bill. The Bill is now being considered by the committee after it was introduced in the budget session of Parliament.

Mishra, in his letter, pointed out that the Bill proposes a decision-making process on introduction of genetically modified (GM) crops ignoring the state governments and local self-governments. "Any decision to introduce a GM crop or permit its field trial in Odisha must ultimately rest with Odisha government, which alone is empowered by the Constitution to look after agriculture and health," he said.

Pointing out mounting evidence on ill-effects of genetically modified crops on human health, environment, livelihood and food security of people, the minister warned of the looming danger if the Bill becomes a regulation.

Mishra said risk assessment proposals in BRAI fail to take into account socio-economic and cultural impacts of GM technology. TOI

Bangladesh takes to GM food crops

Bangladesh takes to GM food crops


DHAKA] Bangladesh has become the first South Asian country to approve commercial cultivation of a genetically modified (GM) food crop — brinjal (also known as eggplant or aubergine) spliced with a gene from the soil bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis .  
 
On 28 October, Bangladesh's National Committee on Biosafety (NBC) approved cultivation of four indigenous varieties of brinjal incorporating a gene from the B. thuringiensis (Bt) to make it resistant to attacks by the fruit and shoot borer (FSB), a common pest in South and Southeast Asia.
 
“We will make seeds and distribute them among the farmers. Hopefully, the vegetables will be available in the market next year,” Mohammad Rafiqul Islam Mondal, director-general of the Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute (BARI), tells SciDev.Net. 
 
According to BARI scientists, the Bt protein in GM brinjal disrupts the digestive systems of the FSB pests, causing them to die within three days of ingestion.
 
The approval comes in the teeth of protests from a section of health,agriculture and environmental activists, accusing the government of ignoring the possibility of negative impacts on public health from consuming the GM version of a popular vegetable.
 
Farida Akhtar, founder of UBINIG, a Bangladeshi NGO which maintains community seed banks, says that Bangladesh is a 'centre of origin' of brinjal and home to over 100 varieties. "These varieties now face genetic contamination from the GM varieties through natural cross-pollination," she tells SciDev.Net.  
 
NBC has, however, justified the approval saying that Bt brinjal would significantly reduce the need to use pesticides and announced that various safeguards were being put into place.
 
Bangladesh's Bt brinjal varieties are derived in part from similar GM varieties developed in India by the Tamil Nadu Agriculture University (TNAU) and Maharashtra Hybrid Seed Company, the Indian subsidiary of the US-based Monsanto Corp.
 
While TNAU had announced that Bt brinjal was safe for consumption, widespread protests compelled the Indian government to order an indefinite moratorium on its release in February 2010.
 
The Philippines has also halted trials on Bt brinjal since 2011 because ofhealth and safety concerns, represented by activists at its supreme court.  
 
Contrastingly, Bangladesh is moving ahead to release more GM food crops, including a vitamin A-enriched rice variety called ‘golden rice’.  
 
Exporters of agricultural produce in Bangladesh are apprehensive that GM crops may cause them to lose markets in importing countries opposed to the technology. SCIDEV

79% want councils to have power over GM crops - poll

79% want councils to have power over GM crops - poll

New Zealand

A group opposed to genetic modification has released a poll showing almost 80% of respondents want councils to retain the power to create GM-free zones.
The phone survey of 1000 people was commissioned by Pure Hawke's Bay and carried out by Colmar-Brunton.
Under proposed changes to the Resource Management Act, central government rather than councils would have the power to decide where GM crops can be grown.
However, Pure Hawke's Bay says 79% of the people surveyed want decision making powers to stay with the councils.
Spokesperson Bruno Chambers says GM free products command a premium price and the group wants GM-free zones so farmers can grow unmodified crops with less risk of contamination.
The survey has a plus or minus margin of error of 3.1%.
RadioNewZealand

Research on GM food in China will not stop: scholar

Research on GM food in China will not stop: scholar
Jiang Gaoming, a researcher at the Institute of Botany of The Chinese Academy of Sciences, said research on genetically modified (GM) food in China will continue no matter what problems arise.
In 2004, the Chinese government listed the cultivation of GM crops as a major scientific development for the country, and it allocated a total budget of more than 20 billion Chinese yuan (US$3.28 billion). Since then, genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have become a very popular area for research, Jiang stated.
The 49-year-old Jiang is a noted anti-GMO scholar in China. He has released several theses questioning the engineering techniques used in the production of GMOs.
He pointed out that an online survey projects that over 90% of Chinese nationals consider GM food unsafe and opposed the commercial production of GM crops in China.
More than 10 years ago, research into GMOs was a niche field of research until a book triggered a discussion on the genetic engineering techniques amongst the Chinese people.
Genetic Engineering-Dream or Nightmare?: The Brave New World of Bad Science and Big Business, a book that opposed genetic engineering, raised the first public debate on GMOs among the Chinese people in 2001.
The book, first published in 1998 and translated and published in Chinese in 2001, noted that GM food could potentially endanger the health of humans and animals. More importantly, the book informed the Chinese people of the debate on GM crops raging in Western society.
Following the public reaction to the book, Greenpeace, a non-governmental environmental organization headquartered in Amsterdam, announced in 2002 that GMOs had been found in food products in Hong Kong.
Zhang Jing, a Greenpeace official, stated that the organization had been following the development of GM crops in China since 2002.
So far, Greenpeace has released 23 reports on GMOs in China.
In 2005, the organization announced that it had found GM crops being grown illegally in Wuhan and Jingzhou during four separate investigations in Hubei. In the latest incident to attract the public spotlight, genetically modified rice was being tested on children in Hengyang in 2012, in what subsequently became known as the "golden rice incident."
Zhang claimed the government's research and development agencies should focus on the potential harm of GMOs to humans rather than simply advertising the advantages of GM food.
An immunology professor at Peking University, Wang Yuedan, said he supported techniques to grow GM food, but he was opposed to GM food being widely promoted without allowing public debate to decide whether it was safe for consumption.
In China, the commercial production of GM crops needs approval. It was said that the Ministry of Agriculture (MOA) planned to grant a security certificate for GM rice, but this did not happen due to the intense debate among the public.
Since 2006, the MOA has issued security certificates for GM papaya and insect-resistant rice, but only GM cotton and papaya are allowed to be produced commercially.
A food law issued in 2012 mandated that GM techniques cannot be adopted as the main food source in the country without prior approval. Wantchinatimes

Friday, November 29, 2013

Journal withdraws controversial French Monsanto GM study

Journal withdraws controversial French Monsanto GM study
The publisher of a controversial and much-criticized study suggesting genetically modified corn caused tumors in rats has withdrawn the paper after a yearlong investigation found it did not meet scientific standards.
Reed Elsevier's Food and Chemical Toxicology journal, which published the study by the French researcher Gilles-Eric Seralini in September 2012, said on Thursday the retraction was because the study's small sample size meant no definitive conclusions could be reached.
"This retraction comes after a thorough and time-consuming analysis of the published article and the data it reports, along with an investigation into the peer-review behind the article," the journal said in statement.
At the time of its original publication, hundreds of scientists across the world questioned Seralini's research, which said rats fed Monsanto's GM corn suffered tumors and multiple organ failure.
The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) issued a statement in November 2012 saying the study by Seralini, who was based at France's University of Caen, had serious defects in design and methodology and did not meet acceptable scientific standards.
Within weeks of its appearance in the peer-reviewed journal, more than 700 scientists had signed an online petition calling on Seralini to release all the data from his research.
In its retraction statement, the Food and Chemical Toxicology journal said that in light of these concerns, it too had requested to view the raw data from the study.
Seralini "agreed and supplied all material that was requested by the editor-in-chief," it said.
The journal said that while it received many letters expressing concerns about the validity of the findings, the proper use of animals and even allegations of fraud, its own investigation found "no evidence of fraud or intentional misrepresentation of the data."
"However, there is a legitimate cause for concern regarding both the number of animals in each study group and the particular strain selected," it said.
Other scientists welcomed the journal's decision to retract the paper, although some said it had come too late.
"The major flaws in this paper make its retraction the right thing to do," said Cathie Martin, a professor at John Innes Centre. "The strain of rats used is highly susceptible to tumors after 18 months with or without GMO (genetically modified organisms) in their diets."
David Spiegelhalter, a professor of the Public Understanding of Risk at the University of Cambridge, said it was "clear from even a superficial reading that this paper was not fit for publication." In this instance, he said, "The peer review process did not work properly.

"But at least this has now been remedied and the journal has recognized that no conclusions can be drawn from this study, so I suppose it is better late than never," Spiegelhalter said. Reuters

Wednesday, November 27, 2013

GM maize crop may get EU green light

GM maize crop may get EU green light

The European Commission is proposing to allow cultivation of maize 1507, as the variety is known, a genetically modified maize variety

Maize 1507 would be only the third GM crop allowed for cultivation within the EU, owing to consumer and national governments having strong reservations about the impact of genetically modified food.
The GM variety is designed to produce its own insecticide against the European corn borer, a destructive moth whose caterpillars feast on corn ears and stalks.
Environmental groups have oppose the crop’s introduction; fearing maize 1507 will harm non-target species and lead to a surge in the use of a toxic herbicide to which maize 1507 has been made resistant.
The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has given the variety a green light in six reports since 2005. However, some restrictions were included in order to prevent collateral damage, such as planting 20% of conventional corn as a buffer zone around a GM crop. The EFSA does not have the final authorisation on the crop. Based on its advice, the European Commission issued a draft decision to authorise the crop. EU member states had to sign off the decision through a regulatory committee, made up of experts from each government.
The committee failed to reach a consensus owing to the wide ranging concerns from countries such as Austria and France, member states that are strictly opposed to growing GM crops, while Holland and Spain are more GM friendly.
Instead of referring to the Council of Members, the commission left the file in abeyance.
Agricultural giant Dupont Pioneer, had requested approval to grow the crop in 2001 but 12 years later, the company still had not been granted a decision.
Dupont finally fought the action in court and in September, the EU Court of Justice in Luxembourg, criticised the commission’s failure to reach a decision. The commission is now pressing member states to take a decision.
However, if the Council of Ministers does not gain a weighted majority to reject the crop’s cultivation within three months, the European Commission has the right to authorise growing the crop and has indicated this will happen.
The commission also pressed member states to avoid lengthy deadlocks in the future, by reconsidering a three year old proposal to reform the EU’s GM authorization procedures. The commission considers individual member states could decide to restrict a given GM crop on their own territory.
The Health commission is seeking to revive the commission’s “cultivation proposal,” which was proposed in 2010, to reform authorization procedures.
Under this plan, an agreement from the European Commission would remain valid across the EU by default, but individual member states could decide not to grow an authorized crop on their territory, even if EFSA considers there are not any scientific objections.
France, Germany, and the UK are believed to be opposed the idea of allowing countries to make individual decisions.
Some member states have questioned the validity of the proposal and consider the concept of renationalising procedures may be illegal, and that measures should remain valid across the EU.
Only two GM crops are permitted for cultivation within the EU; and only one crop is actually grown, Monsanto’s MON 810 maize, which was approved in 1998.
The crop represents 1.35% of total maize surface grown within the EU, the majority being grown in Spain. However, 51 GM crops are authorised for importation into the EU, mainly soya and maize, for feed use. The Journal