Friday, August 23, 2013

GM bananas: from nutrition to disease resistance

GM bananas: from nutrition to disease resistance

Professor James Dale and his team at the Queensland University of Technology (QUT) have come far since gaining support from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) in 2005. Initially focused on vitamin-rich genetically modified (GM) bananas for growers in Uganda, work has extended to India with disease resistance thrown into the mix, while Dale mentions the possibility of collaboration with Nigerian and Indonesian scientists in the future. Catching up with him in Brisbane, www.freshfruitportal.com hears why transgenic bananas may face less resistance than other GMO crops, and their potential if consumers accept the technology.
James Dale QUT - QUT
When Banana Bunchy Top Virus (BBTV) struck Australia in 1913, Dale said it brought down the amount of plantations in South East Queensland from more than 500 to four in a decade, but strict control measures were able to reign in the disease.
One hundred years later, BBTV is still causing problems internationally, particularly in Africa where it has wreaked havoc in many countries that don’t have an effective level of regulatory oversight for containment.
And as growers around the world know well, BBTV is not the only problem that threatens their livelihoods as fungus Black Sigatoka advances in the Americas and Panama Disease Tropical Race IV takes hold in Asia and Australia’s Northern Territory.
Banana breeding stations do exist to take on this pressing issue, but the fruit’s extremely low seed count makes developing disease resistant varieties very tough via conventional methods.
“Cavendish bananas were never bred and all of the commercial cultivars are essentially sterile so the challenge for improving bananas is really difficult,” Dale says.
“The really depressing thing is that humans are bloody good at moving diseases around. We move weeds around, we move insects around and we move plant diseases around very efficiently – in a few instances it’s natural phenomena, but in most instances it’s somebody doing something really stupid.
This curse may be a blessing for proponents of genetically modified bananas, compared to those involved with other GMO crops who at times have faced public outcry for contaminating non-GMO farms through cross-pollination.
“You could have a wild-type banana and a genetically modified banana a close distance apart and nope, there’s no exchange of genetic material.
“In the early 1990s we decided we were going to get involved in genetic modification. I should say that was before anybody said that it was a naughty thing to do – we thought, ‘wow, what a fabulous opportunity to actually improve bananas’, and there’s a huge number of vegetatively propagated crops which you can’t breed from from the already accepted cultivars.
This fact has likely been instrumental for the establishment of QUT’s GM field trials south of Innisfail in North Queensland; the heart of Australia’s banana-growing district.
“We invited any of the banana growers who wanted to come before we planted the field trial, and we went through everything. It took a couple of hours, and they were really comfortable with what we’re doing,” he says.
“There’s no threat because there’s no transgene flow.”
Disease resistance
Dale says his team of 15 people is still working on resistance to Bunchy Top but hasn’t “quite got there yet”, and has also developed a way of controlling Panama Race I – which wiped out previous staple banana variety Gros Michel – through stress tolerant genes.
“For the original genes we’d put in, the best one was from a nematode and that gave us a hint of what we should do, and then we went and looked for the plant equivalents and we’ve been able to use those.
“That’s one strategy. Another is we’ve gone to a wild diploid banana called musa acuminata [spp.] malaccensiswhich grows in Indonesia and Malaysia. Some of those plants are absolutely immune to Tropical Race IV.
He says the malaccensis banana is full of seeds and a teeth-breaking bite into one is awful, but it could be possible to utilize its genes for disease resistance.
“There are about 25,000 types of genes, so it’s needle in a haystack type of stuff. So we’ve got to identify the right gene; we haven’t got the results from the field trial in the Northern Territory yet.
“Because it’s a slow-forming disease, we’d want to have the results probably by the end of next year. We’d be confident if we had lines there that are still standing up, and none of them are diseased, that there’s real resistance there.”
He adds that this variety is also resistant to Black Sigatoka, but his team is not working on that fungus.
“We know that malaccensis is also resistant to Black Sigatoka, so that will come. And it would be interesting to see how some of the big banana companies cope with that, when they’d say , ‘gee, we wouldn’t have to spray if we had these GM bananas’.”
Nutrition for the developing world
Dale’s work received a boost in 2004 when the BMGF put out a call for expressions of interest around grand challenges in global health.
“Most of those global challenges were new vaccines, antibiotics and the control of insect vectors of human diseases; there was one grant challenge nine, which was to develop staple crops with a complete set of micronutrients.
“We’d already started to work with the National Agricultural Research Organization in Uganda so I suggested we make an expression of interest.
“In Uganda their staple food is bananas, and in that whole region there’s very high banana consumption, very high levels of Vitamin A deficiency, and very high levels of iron deficiency; anemia.”
QUT received the funding to collaborate with their Ugandan counterparts, and Dale says “remarkable” progress has been made since then.
“So we’ve now got bananas with more than double our target levels that we wanted for provitamin A.”
He says bananas already have vitamin A through beta-carotene and alpha-carotene, but genetic modification has allowed the scientists to augment the level.
“We were able to take the genes from one of them [beta-carotene] that makes very large amounts and put that banana gene into East African Highland Bananas and into Cavendish.
“The whole issue of vitamin deficiency is really complex – micronutrient deficiencies particularly. There is still this very poor population that don’t buy food and don’t access health clinics, and that can be anywhere between 30-50% of the population in developing countries.
“How do you get to them? They grow staple starch crops and then a little bit of variability but they don’t get enough of the micronutrients from those other crops to be able to supplement.”
The first field trial for Vitamin A was in 2009, with a plan of developing the technology in Australia and then transferring that technology but not the plants to Uganda.
“Now that project is moving into the development phase where we can go and develop an elite line that we’ll take all the way through to farmer release in Uganda, and that will be available to other countries in the region if they want it.
He adds the next part of the Ugandan project is to increase iron levels, which is “much harder”.
“But we’re getting there. We’ve got a 50% increase but we actually want a 400% increase. We’ve got our next field trial in Australia already happening.”
On the back of the Ugandan collaboration’s success, QUT was approached by the Indian government to work on a similar project with its Department of Biotechnology.
“They wanted disease resistance as well, which we put in – they want resistance to bunchy top and Panama wilt.”
Gaining acceptance
Dale says the biggest emotional impact that banana diseases have had on him personally was seeing the effects of Bunchy Top in Malawi in 2008.
“It was really concerning – you see  fields just completely decimated by these diseases. There’s no yield, they don’t get anything.
“Even though bananas aren’t a staple crop in Malawi, it’s their cash crop, and when they don’t have any cash the kids don’t go to school or the local health center.
“If that happened in Nigeria or Uganda, it would be horrendous. We’re doing a lot of talking with people in Nigeria to expand the program to include Bunchy Top resistance.”
He adds that if a new Bunchy Top project started it would include Indonesia as well.
But trials for various traits in GM bananas is just one step for Dale. The next are deregulation and consumer acceptance.
“There’s no  point in having a wonderfully disease-resistant banana if the general public aren’t going to eat it, because the growers won’t grow it.
“I think that is a time issue, and I think what we’ll see over the next decade is quite a significant change as to the reaction against genetically modified plants, particularly as we get more sophisticated in what we do; mainly plant genes, mainly traits that are really important, not just from a few companies but with lots of people doing it.”
He emphasizes that the products of BMGF-funded GM banana projects will be freely available to resource-poor farmers anywhere in the world. - freshfruitportal

JOE DOWNTOWN: FIGHTING MONSANTO WITH MONEY


JOE DOWNTOWN: FIGHTING MONSANTO WITH MONEY


Three months ago, Angie Morelli, head of GMO Free Vegas, directed one of the largest anti-Monsanto marches in the country, with some 3,000 protesters shutting down part of Las Vegas Boulevard and drawing national media coverage.
For those who missed it, the protest was about this: Monsanto, a multinational agricultural biotech company, is a leader in the creation of genetically modified organisms, or GMOs. That includes corn, which plays a part in roughly 70 percent of the foods we eat.
How GMOs might affect the health of those who eat them is a hotly debated topic, but at a minimum, protesters want Congress to force food manufacturers to label items made from genetically altered organisms. In May, 800 scientists from around the globe signed a letter expressing concerns about the threat of genetically modified foods. They asked for “the immediate suspension of all environmental releases of GM crops and products, both commercially and in open field trials, for at least five years; for patents on living processes, organisms, seeds, cell lines and genes to be revoked and banned; and for a comprehensive public inquiry into the future of agriculture and food security for all.”
The European Union has already enacted strict regulations on these new foods, and earlier this year some 5 million farmers sued Monsanto for $7.7 billion related to the company’s royalty charges on seeds.
In the U.S., elected leaders had done virtually nothing regarding GMOs until March, when Congress passed a farm bill that included a proviso widely known as the “Monsanto Protection Act.” In essence, it prevents a judge from enforcing an injunction on genetically modified seeds. There’s a chance, however, for Congress to delete the proviso in October, which is part of Morelli’s goal.
Morelli, 30, spent five years in the Marines, including time in Afghanistan, where she maintained Sikorsky CH-53E Super Stallion helicopters. The only female in her detachment, she was chosen for the post because she was smart, focused and very good at her job. Those same skills have helped her succeed in her civilian business, Customistic, a custom T-shirt/decal shop on Decatur Boulevard near Sahara Avenue. They also helped her oversee that massive anti-GMO/Monsanto protest on May 25.
The protest was such a success that Morelli—whose Vegas childhood rivals any hard-times story Charles Dickens could dream up­—has been asked by various groups to run for state office. She smiles at the requests but flatly refuses. As much as she loves Las Vegas, Morelli doesn’t want to be a politician.
Like so many others, she’s disenchanted with local and federal elected leaders. The way she sees it, for a few thousand dollars in campaign donations, most politicians become willing corporate pawns and the voters be damned.
Morelli, though, is a doer, not a complainer, so right now she is focusing on continuing the fight against genetically modified foods. “The more we let it go, the worse it gets,” she says.
She’s planning another protest march on Oct. 12, and Morelli has also come up with a fairly ingenious boycott she has dubbed the Corn and Currency Revolt.
Taking a cue from the ’60s grape boycott organized by Cesar Chavez in California, Morelli wants people to boycott GM corn. That’s step one. But it’s the currency part of her plan that might force politicians to pay attention.
In a YouTube video posted recently, Morelli talks about politicians being “bought” via corporate campaign donations. “Since they only understand money,” Morelli is asking people to slip a single dollar into an envelope addressed to their congressman, adding a note that the cash is to buy his or her vote against the Monsanto Protection Act.
“Our dollars,” Morelli says, “will speak volumes.”
lasvegasweekly

GM Seeks New Pastures in Pakistan

GM Seeks New Pastures in Pakistan

After a string of setbacks in India in recent years, the genetically modified seed industry is now targeting Pakistan as its next frontier, say activists.
“They want to recoup the market loss that they would suffer through the ban on GM food field trials in India,” Dr Azra Sayeed, an environmentalist and food security expert, told IPS. She termed it a “fresh onslaught of imperialist corporations” and their “unquenchable thirst for profits.”
Wheat in India. Credit: Kinshuk Sunil/CC BY-SA 2.0
Wheat in India. Credit: Kinshuk Sunil/CC BY-SA 2.0
On Jul. 23 a technical expert committee set up by India’s Supreme Court recommended an indefinite moratorium on field trials of genetically modified crops until the government tabled suitable mechanisms for regulation and safety.
A parliamentary standing committee on agriculture had also asked, in an August 2012 report, for a ban on GM food crops in the country, and in March 2012, five Indian states – Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Kerala, Uttarakhand and Karnataka – took a decision to prohibit environmental release of all GM seeds.
Sayeed, who represents Heading Roots for Equity, a Karachi-based non-governmental organisation that advocates the right to food for poor communities, is alarmed that three multinational companies – Monsanto, Pioneer and Syngenta – have recently approached Pakistan’s ministry of food security with a request to launch GM maize and cotton.
The Pakistan Environment Protection Agency has also been asked for an environmental impact assessment.
Sayeed said the U.S.-based agro-chemical giant Monsanto had long been trying to get approval for transgenic corn based on field tests carried out by the corporation itself.
Hailing the indefinite moratorium on GM foods and crops in India as “a very progressive pro-people position,” she said the reasons behind the moratorium were equally valid for Pakistan.
The alternative would “be a crushing blow not only in the erosion of indigenous food crops but would also have further devastating impacts on small and landless farmers,” Sayeed said.
A spate of farmer suicides across India, and especially in areas where GM cotton seeds were introduced over a decade ago, attracted attention to potential impact of GM crops on poor farmer’s incomes.
Prince Charles’s comment on a possible connection between farmers’ suicides and GM crops in an address to a Delhi conference in 2008 gave a fillip to activists campaigning against the Indian government’s caving in to the mainly U.S.-based GM food industry.
So why is GM such a dirty word and why does it leave such a bitter taste in everyone’s mouth?
Pervaiz Amir, an economist who is a member of the prime minister’s Commission of Climate Change, said that to many, GM meant “uncontrollable mutations that create monsters. It is seen as playing god by genetically modifying the makeup of a species or variety,” he told IPS.
But those advocating GM products say they can lead to higher gains in productivity. Yet there are other experts who argue that GM technology is not the only way to break the yield barrier and reach food security.
“Pakistan has the potential to double its present production of all crops just by higher input use and better water management, and by removing some institutional constraints,” Amir said. At the same time, he said, the role of markets is crucial in determining a country’s food security.
Pakistan, he said, produced not only for Pakistan but for the Middle East, Afghanistan and parts of Central Asia. “We have the potential and even the science, but lack the management to produce what we can produce the best.”
Amir compared GM seeds to drone strikes. “Loss of control is loss of almost everything including sovereignty,” he said.
“It conflicts with the Punjab Tenancy Act of 1929 which does not allow non-agriculture interests to own agricultural land,” said Yusuf Agha, a Karachi-based activist who is preparing to file a public interest litigation in the Supreme Court challenging the land lease Corporate Farming Ordinance of 2000.
He said that if multinationals succeed in finding their way into Pakistan’s agriculture and lure farmers to buy GM seeds, farmers will be deprived of their natural seed bank which they have been cultivating over centuries.
In July this year, over 500 organic farmers in India’s Gujarat state announced that they would develop individual seed banks to resist the onslaught of genetically modified seeds.
“All GM seeds should be banned, and natural renewable resources belonging to all humanity must be left unpatentable and unmonopolised,” argued environmentalist Najma Sadeque, who has been studying agricultural trends in Pakistan for two decades.
Her book, The Great Agricultural Hoax, is a storehouse of information on the “poisonous consequences” of making crops and people dependent on GM.
However, Professor Atta-ur-Rahman, a UNESCO recognised scientist, argued in an interview with IPS that GM foods are not detrimental to health. “There is not a single incident worldwide to prove that; these are just fears.”
But he said Pakistan needs to develop GM crops through its own developed technologies. “Imported seeds can often contain death commands whereby you cannot produce more crops from the seeds that are produced by the first crops. This can make us perpetually dependent on others for our agriculture needs, and we can thus become susceptible to exploitation by foreign countries wishing us to toe their lines.” IPS

Indian yields up 30% from Bt cotton – Minister

Indian yields up 30% from Bt cotton – Minister

Bt cotton is the only genetically modified crop that is available for commercial cultivation in India.
According to Mr. Tariq Anwar, Indian Minister of State for Agriculture and Food Processing Industries, 90% of cotton cultivation acres in the last decade were under Bt cotton.
Recently, the minister emphasized that due to Bt cotton, India’s cotton production has benefited and that, there is no scientific evidence to show that Bt cotton cultivation has adversely impacted the ecology and human/cattle health.
According to the information given by Mr. Anwar to the Lower Assembly of the Parliament (Lok Sabha) recently, the cotton yield has increased by 30% due to the introduction of Bt cotton.
Bt cotton and hybrid seed technologies have played important roles in enhancing the yield and production of cotton in India.
Government of India estimates that cotton sowings during this Kharif season (summer sowing season starting in July) is about 11.093 million hectares.
On August 22nd, the Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee of India has approved experimental field trials for the purpose of generating biosafety data for genetically modified crops such as cotton. F2F

Government following a policy of case by case approval of genetically modified crops

The government is following a policy of case by case approval of genetically modified (GM) crops,said Tariq Anwar, minister of state for Agriculture and Food Processing Industries in the Lok Sabha on Tuesday.
He said that extensive evaluation and regulatory approval process takes place before any GM crop is approved for commercial cultivation.This included generation of relevant biosafety information, its elaborate analysis to ensure food, feed and environmental safety. A final view on the commercialization of GM crop plants is taken only when there is a clear economic and technical justification besides suitability for environment and human consumption he said.
As on date, Bt Cotton was the only GM crop that has been introduced for commercial cultivation in the country.
Since inception of Bt. Cotton, there have been objections from some of the non-governmental organizations besides civil society on agriculture, etc., on the grounds that biosafety assessment of Bt Cotton before its introduction and post release monitoring is not adequate and that Bt cotton is not suitable for cultivation in rainfed areas . Further cattle death and farmers suicides have been attributed to introduction of Bt cotton in some regions such as Warangal and Vidarbha.
"The objections have been very speculative, without any reasonable assessment of the technological strengths of Bt-cotton. In spite of the controversy regarding Bt cotton, the ground reality is that during the last decade, area under cotton cultivation (approximately 12 million hectares, of which 90% is under Bt cotton) and productivity of cotton has gone up significantly,""said Mr Anwar.
He said that during the post Bt cotton era, Indian economy has benefited as India is the second largest exporter of cotton. "There is no scientific evidence to show that Bt cotton has adversely impacted the biodiversity or human/cattle health. Bt cotton effectively control bollwsorms, especially Helicoverpa armigera, thus preventing yield losses from an estimated damage of 30% to 60% each year in India. The biggest gain from the technology is in the form of reduced insecticide usage for bollworm control. Yields are estimated to have increased at least by 30% due to effective protection from bollworm damage," he said.ET




Thursday, August 22, 2013

Law on Golden Rice ban urged

Law on Golden Rice ban urged

Non-government organizations supporting organic food and farms want local and national laws to ban genetically-modified crops such as the controversial Golden Rice for its detrimental effect to health and farmers’ income.
The Go Organic Davao City and Go Organic, Mindanao gathered Thursday at Lispher Inn for a forum with city councilors to discuss the passing of an ordinance to stop GM plants in the city.
Atty. Lee Aurello of Third World Network said the city needs this legislation to complement the Organic Agriculture Ordinance it passed in 2010.
“It should be a twin ordinance, as organic farming can’t co-exist with GMO farms because of the effects of pollination from GM varieties that will harm organic farms.”
Aurello said working with LGUs to promote safer agriculture practices have reaped benefits for farmers and consumers alike.
She mentioned their success with LGUs in Negros Occidental, Negros Oriental and Bohol in passing ordinances against GMOs. “It’s a matter of political will. So why can’t Davao do the same?”
In 2010, the city stopped the UP Mindanao from its field testing of BT talong for failing to consult barangay and city officials. The Court of Appeals also ruled last May banning BT talong in the city.
But Aurello said the local ordinance does not discount the need for a national legislation such as the Bio-Safety Law that mandates labelling of food and agriculture products that contain GMOs.
Besides, she said, there is a tendency for agencies to promote GM crops such as the Department of Agriculture that supports testing of BT talong nationwide.
“This agency has a conflict of interest; it regulates and promotes GM crops at the same time,” said Aurello
Dr. Chito Medina, national coordinator of the farmers and  MASIPAG echoed Lee’s sentiments on the difficulty to lobby for legislation in Congress, especially now that the latter is caught in the pork barrel issue.
Medina raised concern on the Golden Rice variety that is being promoted by the Department of Agriculture and IRRI as a new type of rice. Golden Rice is said to contain beta carotene, a source of vitamin A, which would solve deficiency among malnourished children.
The Philippine Rice Research Institute (PhilRice) ran field testing of this variety in Camarines Sur, which was recently uprooted by MASIPAG farmers in protest of GMOs.
The Golden Rice was developed by Ingo Potrykus in Zurich and Peter Beyer Germany from 1991 to 2000, and bought by Syngenta.  The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation backed its food testing for US$ 10 million.
But the Golden Rice variety faces criticisms. In his presentation, Medina said it has not undergone pre-testing to animals and some testing to humans, or any other safety assessment.
He further said that there is danger in genetic engineering crops as it is “so uncontrollable that each event from single experiment of the same materials results to different variety with unpredictable properties.”
Medina warned that the Golden Rice is a “Trojan Horse to create acceptability of GM crops and food, and the image of biotech corporations is recast as philanthropic and humanitarian.”
Medina said the problem of Vitamin A deficiency could be addressed by many food sources such as leafy vegetables, carrots, sweet potato and leaves, goat liver, palm oil, and melon.
He said this shows that organic farming provides all the natural benefits to address nutrition concerns.
He further said organic farming also solves “food security and sovereignty not dictated by MNCs, but rather by sound practices of farmers.”
By Tyrone A. Velez
Davao Today

INDIA: Farmers bodies oppose SC panel recommendations on GM crops


Farmers bodies oppose SC panel recommendations on GM crops


Five member TEC appointed by SC has recently recommended a moratorium on field trials for GM crops

Various farmers organisations, including CIFA, today opposed recommendations of a Supreme Court appointed committee to ban field trials of GM crops, saying the farming community needs biotechnology for progress.

The five-member technical expert committee (TEC), which was appointed by the Supreme Court, has recently recommended a moratorium on field trials for GM (genetically Modified) crops.

"GM crop offers several solutions to farmers problems. We need biotechnology and the right to choose and freedom to farm. "Consortium of Indian Farming Associations (CIFA) Secretary General Chengal Reddy said in a statement.

Reddy was addressing a farmers rally at Jantar Mantar which was organised to protest against TEC recommendations and demand latest technologies in Indian agriculture.

The protest was led by CIFA and was participated by Shetkari Sanghatana, PAU Kisan Club, Naujawan Kisan Club, Nagarjuna Rythu Samakhya, Pratapa Rudra Farmers Mutually Aided Coop Credit & Marketing Federation, amongst other leading farmer organizations.

"It would be unfair to deny India's farmers the benefits of biotechnology, and it would be unfair to the nation to prevent its farmlands from prospering more," Punjab Agricultural University Kisan Club Secretary PS Pangli said.

Reprsentatives of the farmers organisations added that farmers should have the right to choose seeds, and the use of biotech crop is a solution to meet the growing food demand in limited natural resources in the coming years.

Meanwhile, eminent scientists have also appealed to the Supreme Court not to accept the recommendations of five member TEC.

"The TEC has chosen to mischievously mislead the court on GM crops. The committee has deliberately overlooked the opinions of leading scientific organisations in the world and in India, and hundreds of peer reviewed scientific publications," said Shanthu Shantharam of Biosafety Institute of Iowa State University.

PTI

GM food admirer slams Jairam Ramesh for Bt Brinjal move


GM food admirer slams Jairam Ramesh for Bt Brinjal move

British environmental activist Mark Lynas, who once "demonised" geneticially modified crops and now campaigns for their cause, blames Jairam Ramesh for being "cynical" and "politically opportunist" and setting back India's progress in biotechnology when he was environment minister

After years of being a central figure in Greenpeace's anti-GM campaign, Lynas says he realised that opposition was not based on science. In a similar vein, he argues that in India, it was politics, and not any other consideration, that derailed the commercial adoption of Bt Brinjal during Ramesh's tenure in the ministry. 
This decision prevented adoption of other GM food crops, denying the country an important technological option that could have been used to benefit the environment and address food security, he said. "Moratorium on Bt brinjal, for example, came not as a result of any scientific analysis or data, but because of a myopic decision made by a single, very cynical and politically opportunist government minister. 
Bt Brinjal was approved by the regulator and by six academies of science. That debate should have been over, but it came up against bad politics. That is the only issue here, not the scientific, health or environmental or any other issue," Lynas said. 
In February 2010, after rounds of intensive public consultations, Ramesh announced an open-ended moratorium on the release of Bt brinjal until independent scientific studies establish that the product is safe. The moratorium was limited to the commercial trials for Mahyco's Bt brinjal variety using Cry1Ac gene. 
Trials of other varieties of Bt Brinjal by the Indian Institute of Horticulture Research, Bangalore and the Indian Institute of Vegetable Research, Varanasi were not put on hold. Lynas was effusive in his praise for Chidambaram Subramaniam, who as agriculture minister oversaw the green revolution. 
"We need leaders who stand up for science and for evidence-based policymaking, and are prepared to lead from the front, like former agriculture minister Subramanian, who had welcomed Borlaug into India in 1964 despite opposition from traditionalists and the rest of the cabinet....Had those with the leadership skills of Jairam Ramesh been in charge in 1964, the door would have been slammed in Borlaug's face, there would have been no Green Revolution, and India might still be starving today." 
Ironically, despite his stressing on science as the cornerstone of progress, Lynas' praise doesn't extend to MS Swaminathan, the scientist involved in making Green Revolution a reality in India. Perhaps, because Swaminathan was one of those who supported the moratorium on Bt Brinjal. 
"There are unquestionable benefits in the short term, but also potential risks to human health and our brinjal heritage in the long term... What will be the impact of numerous local strains?... Such a collection must be carefully preserved, before we permit the extinction of the gifts of thousands of years of natural evolution and human selection," Swaminathan said while making a case against the commercial introduction of Bt brinjal. Eco. Times